ReviewFrontiers in transplantation2025
Diagnostic approach to elevated dd-cfDNA with reassuring EMB in heart transplantation.
Review in Frontiers in transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy: current applications and future directions.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Allograft Transplantation: Exaggerated Hope or Cautious Reality?Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant advances in organ preservation, surgical techniques, and immunosuppressive regimens, rejection continues to pose a major challenge in the care of heart transplant patients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the gold standard test for surveillance and diagnosis of rejection, but is limited by its invasiveness, interobserver variability, procedural risk, and cost thus prompting the widespread use of non-invasive biomarkers such as donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Due to its high negative predictive value, dd-cfDNA is often routinely used for surveillance of asymptomatic patients. However, it is a non-specific marker of allograft injury and elevated levels in the presence of a reassuring EMB creates a diagnostic dilemma. This review explores the pathophysiological basis and clinical utility of dd-cfDNA in monitoring of heart transplant recipients with particular focus on evaluation and management of discordant findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.