ArticleInnovation in aging2025
Association of dietary index for gut microbiota and sarcopenia: the mediation effect of body roundness index.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking the dietary inflammation index to sarcopenia in diabetes: mediation by body roundness index and evidence from complementary analyses.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Obesity accelerates aging: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Association Between Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota and Sarcopenic Obesity in Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: The Mediation Role of Hepatic Steatosis Index.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The complex interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and metabolic health has gained increasing recognition as a key factor in the development of obesity and related conditions, such as sarcopenia. This study examines the relationship between the dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) and sarcopenia, while exploring the potential mediating role of the body roundness index (BRI) in this association. By integrating these factors, our findings aim to shed light on the diet-gut microbiota-sarcopenia interaction and its implications for personalized dietary interventions. Research Design and Methods: Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2018. Multivariable weighted regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between DI-GM and sarcopenia. Restricted cubic spline analyses were used to evaluate potential non-linear relationships. Additionally, mediation analysis was performed to determine whether the BRI mediated the relationship between DI-GM and sarcopenia. Results: A total of 10,190 participants were included in the study, of whom 7.57% were diagnosed with sarcopenia. In the weighted linear regression analysis, each one-point increase in DI-GM was associated with a 12% reduction in the prevalence of sarcopenia (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.95). Specifically, a higher beneficial gut microbiota score was significantly associated with a lower prevalence of sarcopenia (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.89). Mediation analysis revealed that BRI accounted for 23% of the total effect of DI-GM on sarcopenia. Among the beneficial components, those with a significant mediation effect contributed approximately 9% of the total effect. Discussion and Implications: The DI-GM was found to be negatively associated with the prevalence of sarcopenia, with BRI playing a crucial mediating role. These findings highlight the importance of the diet-gut microbiota-sarcopenia interaction and underscore the potential for incorporating dietary and microbiota-targeted interventions in personalized therapeutic strategies for sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.