Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895046›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Ultra-processed food consumption is linked to quality of life and mental distress among university students.

Yasemin Ertaş Öztürk, Zeynep Uzdil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasemin Ertaş ÖztürkDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.
Zeynep UzdilDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are industrial formulations that typically contain little or no whole foods and are often high in added sugars, unhealthy fats, and sodium. Research indicates that higher intake of UPFs correlates with lower overall diet quality, which can exacerbate mental health issues such as anxiety and depression. This study aimed to assess the associations between UPF consumption with health-related quality of life, and mental distress in university students. Method: This cross-sectional study consisted of 595 students resident in Samsun/Türkiye. The data were collected face-to-face with a questionnaire. Linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between the UPFs (% energy), health-related quality of life components and mental distress score (MDS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to establish the optimal threshold levels regarding physical component summary (PCS12), mental component summary (MCS12) and MDS. Results: The UPF ratios were negatively related to PCS12 (β = -0.112, Conclusion: Increased consumption of UPFs is associated with a decrease in physical quality of life and an increase in mental distress. Consuming more than 40% from UPFs can lead to mental and physical problems. There is a need for strategies to decrease the intake of UPFs to enhance both physical and mental wellbeing.

Indexed as

Fast FoodsPsychological DistressQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalStudentsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood, ProcessedHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultDietary patternMental distressMoodQuality of lifeUltra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID40895046
PMCPMC12393073

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.