Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895051›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Diurnal moths have larger hearing organs: evidence from comparative 3D morphometric study on geometrid moths.

Pritha Dey, Max Söderholm, Pasi Sihvonen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pritha DeyFinnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland.
Max SöderholmFinnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0009-0003-2877-1341
Pasi SihvonenFinnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2237-9325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tympanal organs, crucial for anti-bat defence in moths and key for taxonomy, are often overlooked due to their fragility during dissection. Using micro-CT, we analyzed the tympanal organs of 19 geometrid species, comparing diurnal and nocturnal species to understand how predators, like bats and diurnal birds or lizards, influence tympanal morphology and its allometric relationship with body size. We hypothesized that diurnal moths, with reduced anti-bat function, would have smaller tympanal organs, irrespective of body size. Allometry was tested using phylogenetic linear regression and tympanal volume was compared across diurnal and nocturnal moths relative to the abdominal volume. We used 3D geometric morphometry, followed by comparative analysis of the shape and size of ansa, a unique "mechanical" structure for geometrids. Contrary to our hypothesis, diurnal moths had significantly larger tympanal organs, with no allometric relationship with body size. Although activity patterns had no significant effect on ansa shape and size, convergence in shape among nocturnal species, suggests a possible auditory function. This study explores how daily activity patterns and predator-prey interactions may influence sensory adaptations, with larger tympanal organs of diurnal species potentially reflecting adaptations to detect lower, "non-bat" frequencies. It also highlights non-invasive imaging techniques for studying delicate anatomical features in museum specimens.

Indexed as

HearingMothsAnimalsBody SizeImaging, Three-DimensionalOrgan SizePhylogenyX-Ray MicrotomographyBatsGeometridae mothsHearing organsMicro-CTPredation pressure

Identifiers

PMID40895051
PMCPMC12396209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.