ArticlePeerJ2025
Socioeconomic status and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women in Zunyi, China.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The impact of socioeconomic status on disease is becoming increasingly apparent. However, the relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and socioeconomic status (SES) has been less studied and remains inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between SES and GDM. Methods: All participants were selected from a prospective study on maternal and infant health in Zunyi City, China, between 2020 and 2022. Data on educational attainment, occupation, and household income were collected through standard questionnaires administered during face-to-face interviews. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), evaluating the association between GDM and SES-a composite measure comprising educational attainment, occupational status, and household monthly income. Results: Among 5,868 participants, 690 women (11.8%) were diagnosed with GDM. After adjusting for potential confounders, no significant association was observed between educational attainment and GDM prevalence. Compared to public sector employees, women engaged in private sector occupations, freelancing, or farming exhibited a lower GDM risk. Household monthly income demonstrated a significant positive correlation with GDM incidence. Stratified analyses revealed distinct age-related patterns: higher education attainment was associated with reduced GDM risk in women aged >35 years, while occupational influences on GDM were more pronounced in this age group. Conversely, income effects were stronger among women aged ≤35 years. BMI stratification further indicated that occupational factors predominantly affected GDM risk in underweight women (BMI <18.5 kg/m Conclusion: Our study revealed a significant association SES and GDM development. Among household income and occupation emerged as stronger predictor of GDM to educational attainment in Zunyi City, Guizhou province, China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.