ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025
Platelet-rich plasma-contained drug delivery systems to treat orthopedic injuries.
Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthopedic trinity: Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and regenerative orthopedics.World journal of orthopedics · 2026Review
- Tendon, Ligament, and Muscle Injury, Osteotendinous, Myotendinous, and Muscle-to-Bone Junction Therapy Perspectives with Growth Factors and Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Is Plasma Total Antioxidant Capacity Elevated in Professional Soccer Athletes?: A Cross-Sectional Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma for Postherpetic Neuralgia: Proposed Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Future Research Directions.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Advances in Cell-Mediated Drug Delivery for Dermatologic Diseases: Mechanisms and Current Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthopedic disorders affecting bones, joints, muscles, tendons, and other tissues are prevalent among outpatients, often caused by trauma, sports, or tumor removal. Surgical intervention is common but may yield unsatisfactory results due to limited regenerative capacity and poor blood supply. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous biocomponent, has been clinically applied in tissue regeneration and repair, yet it faces challenges such as unclear mechanisms, side effects, and uncontrollable release. This review provides evidence for further clinical research on PRP and its associated drug delivery strategies in orthopedics. We searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases Inclusion criteria focused on original studies containing the phrases ("orthopedic injuries," "nanotechnology," "microsphere," or "drug delivery system") and ("platelet-rich plasma") over two decades to provide evidence to support further clinical research on PRP combined with nanotechnology in osteoarthritis, fractures, cartilage repair, and other orthopedic fields. Excluding criteria were referred to studies only describing "nanotechnology," "microsphere," or "drug delivery system". In conclusion, PRP is a novel therapeutic tool for orthopedic diseases with advantages over traditional surgery. However, its clinical efficacy, action mechanisms, and preparation standards need further clarification. Future research should optimize PRP's therapeutic concentration, administration, and timing, and explore high-concentration PRP GFs as alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.