ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025
From prescribing indicators to rational drug use: a medication safety perspective.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prescription Analysis in the Digital Era: Comparing Artificial Intelligence-Based Versus Manual Approaches.Cureus · 2026Article
- Pharmacist-led Review of Drug Utilization of Antipsychotic Medications in a Tertiary Government Hospital in Cebu City, Philippines.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Prevalence and predictors of prescribing errors in a primary care setting in Ghana.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- Prescribing Patterns and Adverse Reactions of Antipsychotics in a North Indian Psychiatry Outpatient Department.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past few decades, the emergence of irrational medicine use has become a significant global health challenge. It has contributed to medication errors, adverse drug reactions, higher treatment costs, increased morbidity, and mortality. Problems with irrational prescribing are a matter of concern in low and middle-income countries, where regulatory control is underdeveloped, healthcare systems are constrained by economic pressures, and there is a shortage of trained personnel. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed core prescribing indicators to assess and promote rational medication use for healthcare settings. These include indicators measuring polypharmacy, antibiotic use, injectable use, generic prescribing, and adherence to essential medicine lists. This narrative commentary explores the potential of WHO prescribing indicators in promoting the rational use of medicines, highlighting their role in patient safety and supporting evidence-based prescribing practices. The five key areas of these indicators provide valuable insights into prescribing practices in healthcare settings of low and middle-income countries. These indicators also support the WHO's initiative of Medication without Harm. Despite their potential strengths, there are some potential limitations, such as failing to capture the data behind the prescribing practices of prescribers and their utility in specialised healthcare settings. The future of rational prescribing lies in adapting these tools through qualitative assessments, comprehensive data collection methods that include qualitative study design approaches, and targeted training interventions to ensure safe, effective, and equitable medication practices across healthcare systems globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.