Evidence mapPaperPMID 40896208Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Bryher Bowness, Samina Begum, Sarah Bicknell, Lana Samuels, Sudhir Shah, Stephanie Hess, Karen Martin, Debbie Bark, Claire Henderson, Vanessa Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bryher BownessDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Samina BegumIndependent Researcher, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Sarah BicknellResearch and Development, Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Lana SamuelsIndependent Researcher, London, United Kingdom.
Sudhir ShahIndependent Researcher, London, United Kingdom.
Stephanie HessOxfordshire Recovery College, Restore, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Karen MartinOxfordshire Recovery College, Restore, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Debbie BarkOxfordshire Recovery College, Restore, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Claire HendersonDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Vanessa LawrenceDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The benefits of attending Recovery Colleges for mental and social wellbeing are well-documented, but the experiences of family carers (roughly 6-11% of students) are underexplored. Family carers report that attending courses supports their own wellbeing and recovery journeys, but also call for greater recognition and relevant provision from Recovery Colleges. Materials and methods: This Participatory Action Research project was codesigned by a Family Carers Advisory Group, an academic researcher, and staff at a Recovery College in England. We aimed to expand Recovery College provision to promote family carers' wellbeing, by coproducing and coevaluating a creative course exploring self-care. We collected data through online feedback forms, fieldnotes, photographs and participatory reflective sessions, and collaboratively explored the family carers' experiences of the course through inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Seven family carers enrolled on our three-part online course Discussion: This example shows how Participatory Action Research can be an effective approach to designing courses for family carers in a Recovery College. We explore deeper understandings of self-care whilst caring, and the ways creativity can enable this and have wider reaching benefits. Our findings also add to the literature on implementing adult education in practice in Recovery College settings. Finally, we provide some implications for improving courses for family carers and future research.

Indexed as

coproductioncreativityfamily carermental healthParticipatory Action ResearchRecovery Collegerelational recoveryself-care

Identifiers

PMID40896208
PMCPMC12395343

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.