ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
Memory, Sleep, Dreams, and Consciousness: A Perspective Based on the Memory Theory of Consciousness.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Alzheimer's disease with the TMS-EEG perturbation complexity index.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- Frontal Disorders and Consciousness: A Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insights into the mysteries of dreaming and waking conscious experience can be gained by considering fundamental concepts in memory research. To support this assertion, we first provide an overview of the conscious/nonconscious distinction in memory research and then summarize the memory theory of consciousness (MToC). According to the MToC, the brain system responsible for explicit memory is also responsible for all our conscious experiences-perceptions, thoughts, memories, imaginings, and dreams. Ordinarily, we experience a continuity of consciousness, even when we wake from a period of sleep. On the other hand, memory dysfunction can disrupt this continuity across sleep and lead to disorientation upon awakening. The relationship between sleep and consciousness comes into sharper focus when considering the proposition that most sleep-based memory processing is below the surface of what we can experience. During sleep, stored information is reactivated in the service of memory consolidation and, unlike dreams, this memory processing remains in the realm of implicit memory. We further propose that many multifarious memories can be simultaneously reactivated through this sleep-based processing, engaging both the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. At the same time, fragments of information from a subset of reactivated memories may be strung together to create a consciously experienced storyline or dream. In keeping with the MToC, we emphasize that conscious experiences, both while awake and while dreaming, are not read-outs of external reality even though they are typically experienced as such. Sensory experiences seem direct and instantaneous, but they are indirect and delayed because they require sensory processing to reach the explicit-memory system. Furthermore, because we remain oblivious to the unconscious memory processing that pervades our sleep, people generally underestimate the impact of sleep on our subsequent recollections and habits in the wake state. In sum, memory research enriches our understanding of consciousness in many ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.