ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Computational modeling of visual salience alteration and its application to eye-movement data.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational saliency map models have facilitated quantitative investigations into how bottom-up visual salience influences attention. Two primary approaches to modeling salience computation exist: one focuses on functional approximation, while the other explores neurobiological implementation. The former provides sufficient performance for applying saliency map models to eye-movement data analysis, whereas the latter offers hypotheses on how neuronal abnormalities affect visual salience. In this study, we propose a novel saliency map model that integrates both approaches. It handles diverse image-derived features, as seen in functional approximation models, while implementing center-surround competition-the core process of salience computation-via an artificial neural network, akin to neurobiological models. We evaluated our model using an open eye-movement dataset and confirmed that its predictive performance is comparable to the conventional saliency map model used in eye-movement analysis. Beyond eye-movement prediction, our model enables neural-level simulations of how neurobiological disturbances influence salience computation. Simulations showed that parameter changes for excitatory-inhibitory balance, baseline neural activity, and synaptic connection density affected the contrast between salient and non-salient objects-in other words-the weighting of salience. Finally, we demonstrated the model's potential for quantifying changes in salience weighting as reflected in eye movements, highlighting its ability to bridge both predictive and neurobiological perspectives. These results present a novel strategy for investigating mechanisms underlying abnormal visual salience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.