Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896339›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Computational modeling of visual salience alteration and its application to eye-movement data.

Yoshihisa Fujita, Toshiya Murai, Jun Miyata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoshihisa FujitaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiya MuraiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Jun MiyataDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational saliency map models have facilitated quantitative investigations into how bottom-up visual salience influences attention. Two primary approaches to modeling salience computation exist: one focuses on functional approximation, while the other explores neurobiological implementation. The former provides sufficient performance for applying saliency map models to eye-movement data analysis, whereas the latter offers hypotheses on how neuronal abnormalities affect visual salience. In this study, we propose a novel saliency map model that integrates both approaches. It handles diverse image-derived features, as seen in functional approximation models, while implementing center-surround competition-the core process of salience computation-via an artificial neural network, akin to neurobiological models. We evaluated our model using an open eye-movement dataset and confirmed that its predictive performance is comparable to the conventional saliency map model used in eye-movement analysis. Beyond eye-movement prediction, our model enables neural-level simulations of how neurobiological disturbances influence salience computation. Simulations showed that parameter changes for excitatory-inhibitory balance, baseline neural activity, and synaptic connection density affected the contrast between salient and non-salient objects-in other words-the weighting of salience. Finally, we demonstrated the model's potential for quantifying changes in salience weighting as reflected in eye movements, highlighting its ability to bridge both predictive and neurobiological perspectives. These results present a novel strategy for investigating mechanisms underlying abnormal visual salience.

Indexed as

computational modeleye movementneural networksaliency mapvisual salience

Identifiers

PMID40896339
PMCPMC12392920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.