ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
To Evaluate Interdisciplinary Integration in Medical Education Through a Pulmonary Fibrosis Case Study.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This article examines the teaching method of experimental design in the context of Chinese universities, specifically focusing on the exploration of the disease development process. Cultivating innovative and research-oriented medical skills is a crucial objective within medical education, and the design of high-quality experimental courses is a significant aspect of optimizing and reforming medical education. Methods: Innovative experimental teaching design serves as a novel approach to integrating scientific research into undergraduate instruction. Centered on the exploration of the disease development process and combining the characteristics of clinical diseases, this method integrates experimental techniques from diverse disciplines such as anatomy, pathology, and molecular biology. It achieves a seamless fusion of theoretical knowledge and experimental operations. In this teaching initiative, students are fully immersed in the entire journey, from establishing disease-model mice to collecting and identifying samples at various time points during disease progression. Through hands-on engagement, students not only enhance their experimental skills but also gain a vivid and profound understanding of the dynamic evolution of diseases. Results: From the perspective of experimental exploration, students' theoretical understanding is reinforced, and they grasp the occurrence and progression of diseases. This approach provides technical support for scientific research and offers a new line of thinking for the treatment of clinical diseases. Conclusion: Experimental teaching focused on exploring the disease development process can foster students' scientific thinking, enhance their practical capabilities, and cultivate research-oriented medical professionals while they learn experimental techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.