Evidence mapPaperPMID 40896480Full record

ReviewAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2025

Understanding the differences in rumen bacteria and their impact on dairy cows' production performance: A review.

Jianhao Yang, Yifan Li, Mengkun Sun, Shanshan Guo, Pengfei Lin, Aihua Wang, Yaping Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianhao YangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Yifan LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Mengkun SunCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Shanshan GuoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Pengfei LinCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Aihua WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Yaping JinCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aimed to summarize the relationship between rumen bacteria and production performance in dairy cows. The composition and metabolic functions of rumen bacteria significantly influenced production performance. However, previous studies lacked a systematic review of how variations in rumen bacterial composition correlate with production performance. This review described the differences in rumen bacterial composition among dairy cows with varying production performance, focusing on milk yield and composition, feed efficiency (FE), average daily gain (ADG) and methane production. Additionally, we explored the differences in rumen bacteria across different parities and testing time points. Through this systematic summary, we discussed the impact of rumen bacterial composition on dairy cow production performance and provided new insights and guidelines for devising targeted microbiome adjustment strategies.

Indexed as

Cow nutritionProduction performanceRumen bacteria

Identifiers

PMID40896480
PMCPMC12391802

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.