Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896709›Full record

ArticleMedical research archives2024

A Personalized Medicine Approach is Best for Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Ana Morales, Allison Jamison, Robert A Hegele, Linda Hemphill, Samuel S Gidding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical research archives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana MoralesDepartment of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Allison JamisonFamily Heart Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Robert A HegeleSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, CA.
Linda HemphillCorrigan Minehan Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. USA.
Samuel S GiddingDepartment of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.

Funding

Collaborative Approach to Reach Everyone with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: CARE-FHR33HL161775 · NHLBI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI Samuel S Gidding · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL161775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an autosomal semi-dominant condition characterized by biallelic pathogenic variants impacting low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) function. Affected individuals have severely elevated LDL cholesterol, early onset atherosclerotic heart disease and/or aortic stenosis, and characteristic clinical findings. While the cause is known and diagnosis is relatively simple, real-world HoFH care presents many complexities, including genetic heterogeneity and the diverse personal and social circumstances that influence care. Genetics-informed treatment involves a trial-and-error approach that warrants specific considerations during pregnancy. Thus, HoFH care requires a deep understanding of personal factors, social determinants of health, and a flexible, adaptable approach to treatment, all of which justify the need for personalized care. Framed by complexity theory, this review offers strategies for personalizing HoFH care, including a reconceptualization of the definition of health and implementing a multidisciplinary team approach. We also recommend integrating complexity theory and systems thinking into clinical care. By doing so, we illustrate the advantages of classifying knowledge complexity to inform clinical decision-making. We also demonstrate how openness to relationship-building and time investment is critical to materializing personalized care to HoFH.

Identifiers

PMID40896709
PMCPMC12393222

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.