SynthesisSaudi medical journal2025
A systematic review of physical therapy rehabilitation for stroke survivors in Arab countries and Saudi Arabia: current approaches and future challenges.
Synthesis in Saudi medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of motor relearning program in sit-to-stand transfer and activities of daily living among chronic stroke patients - a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Trial
- Trends in Stroke Burden and Rehabilitation Demand in Saudi Arabia, 1990-2021, with Projections to 2030: A National Analysis Using GBD 2021 Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically review physical therapy interventions for stroke survivors in Arab countries and summarize the clinical and demographic characteristics, types and intensities of interventions, outcomes assessed, and adverse events.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of Google Scholar, ISI web of science, Scopus, Medline/PubMed, and ProQuest databasesfrom inception to 2025. Studies were eligible if they evaluated physical therapy interventions for stroke rehabilitation in Arab countries and reported clinical outcomes. We included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. Study selection followed PRISMA guidelines.
resultsFive studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), and robotic-assisted therapy. NMES improved gait and lower limb function; CIMT and robotic-assisted therapy enhanced upper limb motor recovery; rESWT reduced spasticity and increased grip strength. Variability in methodologies, short durations, and limited accessibility were common limitations.
conclusionAlthough physical therapy interventions show beneficial outcomes for stroke rehabilitation in Arab countries, the evidence base is limited due to the small number of reported studies. There is a clear need for more high-quality research, including multicenter and longitudinal studies, to establish standardized, accessible, and culturally relevant rehabilitation practices across the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.