ArticleSaudi medical journal2025
Relationship between the prevalence of breast arterial calcifications on mammography and coronary calcifications on Chest CT: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the relationship between breast arterial calcifications (BAC) detected on mammography and coronary artery calcifications (CAC) identified on chest CT in Saudi women, focusing on prevalence, age-specific patterns, and cardiovascular risk factors.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia using data from hospital electronic medical records of 60 women aged 40-88 years who underwent mammography and chest CT, within the same year during the time period from January 2021 to December 2022. Data on demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and imaging findings were collected. The association between BAC and CAC was analyzed using chi-square tests and binary logistic regression.
resultsThe BAC was detected in 33.3% of the participants, while CAC was present in 21.7%. A significant association was observed between the presence of BAC and CAC (
conclusionThe findings highlight the potential utility of BAC as a non-invasive marker for CAC, particularly in older women. Routine reporting of BAC on mammography could enhance cardiovascular risk stratification in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.