Evidence mapPaperPMID 40897486Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Diabetes self-management observational study investigating how CGM use impacts diabetes distress, glycaemia and functions as a technological substitute for hypoglycaemia awareness: a study protocol.

Mette Juul Nitschke, Ceren Demir, Julie Maria Bøggild Brøsen, Ingrid Willaing Tapager, Kirsten Nørgaard, Peter Lommer Kristensen, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06453434 (The Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Based Self-management on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Glycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06453434 not yet recruitingnot on this map

The Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Based Self-management on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Glycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorNordsjaellands HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsType 1 Diabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette Juul NitschkeDepartment of Endocrinology and Nephrology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark mette.juul.nitschke@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7691-3840
Ceren DemirDepartment of Endocrinology and Nephrology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5437-0570
Julie Maria Bøggild BrøsenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Ingrid Willaing TapagerSelf-employed consultant, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten NørgaardSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Peter Lommer KristensenDepartment of Endocrinology and Nephrology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5431-824X
Ulrik Pedersen-BjergaardDepartment of Endocrinology and Nephrology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-4880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides real-time glucose data for people with diabetes. However, detailed knowledge of its use in daily life remains limited. We aim to investigate the interaction between people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their CGM data and the impact of the interaction on glycaemia and diabetes distress. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a two-centre observational study of adults (n=500) with T1D using FreeStyle Libre 2. Over a period of 14 days, participants will continue their regular CGM use, record insulin doses and timing with smart insulin pens, track activity and sleep with an activity tracker, log all food intake in the LibreLink app and answer questions about quality of life and hypoglycaemia two times per day. Before the study period, the participants will complete a survey of 11 validated questionnaires assessing diabetes distress, hypoglycaemia awareness and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). After the study period, the participants will complete two additional questionnaires assessing diabetes distress and health literacy.The collected data will be used in two substudies with the overall aims of:Substudy 1: to investigate how CGM is used in practice and the impact of the interaction on diabetes distress and glycaemia.Substudy 2: to investigate whether and how CGM functions as a technological substitute for impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia, focusing on alarm data.Endpoints will include CGM metrics, alarm data and PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Danish Data Protection Agency approved the study (P-2024-15985), and the regional committee on health research ethics has granted an ethical waiver (H-24014662). All participants have signed written informed consent forms before participating. The results will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal by the study investigators and shared via www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. Participants who agreed to receive information about the study will be sent the results after publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06453434).

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HypoglycemiaSelf-ManagementAdultBlood GlucoseFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicQuality of LifeBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinDiabetes & endocrinologyDigital TechnologyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID40897486
PMCPMC12414178

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.