ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2025
Contemporary management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugate based therapy in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of emerging clinical evidence.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Dna aneuploidy and urothelial carcinoma: A meta-analysis.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2026Review
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma, the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, presents a significant challenge, particularly in its metastatic stage, where prognosis remains poor despite advancements in treatment. Historically, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard first-line therapy, achieving moderate response rates but limited long-term survival. Recent breakthroughs have introduced immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and targeted therapies as more effective alternatives. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy as a first-line treatment, improving overall survival (OS) and objective response rates compared to chemotherapy. Maintenance therapy with avelumab has further prolonged survival in patients responding to initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Additionally, sacituzumab govitecan, an ADC targeting Trop-2, and erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, have provided promising options for patients with refractory disease or FGFR alterations. The evolving treatment paradigm now prioritizes biomarker-driven, personalized approaches over traditional chemotherapy-based regimens. However, challenges remain in optimizing treatment sequencing and managing toxicity. Future research should focus on refining patient selection criteria and exploring novel combination therapies to enhance efficacy and durability of response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.