ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2025
Establishing consensus recommendations for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in South Korea: A modified Delphi study.
Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testosterone dynamics and oncologic safety in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: An analysis of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy schedules.Prostate international · 2026Article
- Residential location shapes initial prostate cancer care in Korea (2010-2020): A nationwide stage- and risk-stratified study.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Article
- AR-V7 expression in primary non-metastatic prostate cancer and its role in disease progression following initial therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConsensus is lacking among South Korean urologists on the appropriate treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). A modified, Delphi-based consensus on managing mHSPC patients was developed to support clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-six questions on mHSPC treatment were developed by an expert committee (five urologists). Nine questions required achievement of consensus (key questions). Twenty-three urologists participated in two rounds of a Delphi survey. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement among panelists, with ≥90% agreement representing strong consensus.
resultsEighteen questions (50.0%) reached strong consensus, 15 (41.7%) reached consensus, and three (8.3%) reached no consensus. Eight key questions (88.9%) reached strong consensus and one (11.1%) reached consensus. Consensus was reached on recommending androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification, irrespective of disease volume or type, with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) as the preferred option. Not using docetaxel alone with ADT when an ARPI is available for treatment intensification was recommended (strong consensus). For high-volume mHSPC patients with a pathogenic, speckle-type poxvirus and zinc finger protein mutation, ADT+ARPI was recommended over triplet therapy (strong consensus). Panelists recommended regular imaging every 6-12 months if no ARPI reimbursement restrictions exist, but a 3-month interval (per current reimbursement guidelines) otherwise. ADT+ARPI was the most recommended systemic treatment (strong consensus).
conclusionsThis Delphi consensus established local consensus on controversial areas of mHSPC management. The findings offer meaningful perspectives that may help shape future treatment strategies and encourage thoughtful reconsideration of reimbursement criteria to align evidence and clinical practice in South Korea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.