Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897741›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cross-sectional analysis of sociodemographic factors associated with self-reported and knowledge-based health literacy in Korea using data from KNHANES 2023.

Ki Young Huh, Ildae Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ki Young HuhDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ildae SongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Kyungsung University, No. 708 (7th floor), 309 Suyeong-ro Daeyeon-dong, Nam-ku, Busan, Republic of Korea. cianni77@kyungsung.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea MOE: 2023RIS-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health literacy is a key factor influencing treatment adherence and outcomes. This study analyzed the 2023 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) to explore the relationship between demographic and socioeconomic factors and health literacy. We examined associations between factors such as age, gender, residential region, education, and income with health literacy, which consisted of 10 questions and 1 knowledge assessment. Multiple linear regression was applied to the sum of health literacy scores, and multivariate ordinal regression was used for the knowledge assessment. A total of 5,713 participants were analyzed. Results showed that age ≥ 65 years negatively affected health literacy scores (- 1.01), while females had a positive effect (0.93), though elderly females had a negative impact (- 1.60). Higher education and income were positively associated with health literacy, with education showing the greatest effect (3.42). Elderly individuals and education levels had the strongest negative and positive effects, respectively, in the Technology and Resources domain. In conclusion, older age, lower education, and lower income were linked to lower health literacy, with gender's impact varying by age group, especially in digital health literacy.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracySelf ReportAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRepublic of KoreaSociodemographic FactorsHealth literacyKorea National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyRetrospective study

Identifiers

PMID40897741
PMCPMC12405510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.