ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Recommendations for Optimizing Research Regarding the Effects of Dehydration on Athletic Performance.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the MX3 hydration testing system in adults at rest and following exercise in the heat.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Hydration Knowledge, Water Consumption, and Attitudes Toward Drinking Water Quality Among Adults in Romania: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Revisiting the need for innovative oral hydration technologies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Effect of intentional daily liter of plain water on total fluid and caloric intake among free-living adults.PloS one · 2026Article
- A review of safety risk management and optimization strategies for physical education classes in Chinese schools in heat-stress environments.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dehydration's adverse impact on athletic performance is a critical concern in sports science, yet its investigation remains challenging due to interindividual variability and methodological inconsistencies. Traditional reductionist approaches, which isolate single variables, are insufficient to capture the multifactorial nature of dehydration, which emerges from dynamic interactions among physiological and behavioral factors. These include the method of inducing dehydration, protocol duration, type of fluid loss, environmental conditions, participant characteristics, assessment techniques, and potential nocebo effects. Despite the complexity and relevance of this issue, standardized guidelines for designing sport-specific dehydration studies are lacking. This article addresses this gap by cataloging key interacting variables and offering structured, adaptable guidance rather than proposing a rigid framework. It introduces a dual framework of 'challenges and considerations' and 'recommendations' for each factor, aiming to support researchers in developing rigorous, context-specific study designs. Ultimately, this approach will promote a more nuanced understanding of dehydration and facilitate reproducible, sport-relevant research advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.