ArticleBMC neuroscience2025
Investigating topological alterations in procedural memory network across neuropsychiatric disorders using rs-fMRI and graph theory.
Article in BMC neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive network dysfunction represents a core pathophysiological feature across major neuropsychiatric disorders, including Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia (SZ). The procedural memory network (PMN), involving cortico-striatal-cerebellar circuits, is vital for skill learning and automatic cognition. However, its topological changes and link to cognitive impairments have not been studied across major neuropsychiatric disorders.
methodsThis study analyzed resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) data from 40 individuals with ADHD, 49 with BD, 50 with SZ, and 50 healthy controls (HCs). PMN was defined using 34 regions of interest (ROIs) from Harvard-Oxford Atlas, with graph theory measures calculated for all regions. Significant network disruptions emerged, showing altered local efficiency (LE), average path length (APL), and degree (P < 0.05) across groups.
resultsKey findings show that in ADHD, increased APL in left cerebellar lobule VII indicates disrupted information flow and emotional processing, while decreased connectivity in the right claustrum may impair integration and working memory. In BD, reduced LE in right cerebellar lobule II is linked to attention and motor control deficits; increased APL in lobules I and VIII suggests disrupted network communication and emotional processing; and decreased connectivity in the right subthalamic nucleus and lobule VIII may contribute to mood swings and attention problems. In SZ, decreased LE in right putamen and left cerebellar lobule VIII relates to working memory and emotional processing deficits; reduced APL in right caudate and cerebellar lobule II implies more effort for regional communication; and increased connectivity in the caudate and right cerebellar lobules I and II likely reflects compensatory or pathological hyperactivity. Comparisons indicate SZ shows increased connectivity in the claustrum and cerebellar lobule I, unlike ADHD which shows decreases in these areas; SZ has lower network efficiency but higher caudate connectivity than BD, which has more cerebellar and subthalamic disruptions; and BD shows decreased connectivity in the claustrum and subthalamic nucleus compared to ADHD, which has more cerebellar and attention network changes.
conclusionThese findings suggest that the PMN, particularly its segregation and integration properties, plays a key role in explaining cognitive deficits in ADHD, BD, and SZ. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.