ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Sex-specific association of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a large-scale perspective cohort study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Incidence in Adolescents and Young Adults Aged 10-24 Years: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease in East Asia and China between 1990 and 2021: insights from the 2021 global burden of disease research.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Global Research Trends in Comorbidity Between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease: A Bibliometric Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have revealed an association between abdominal obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but body size differences across genders were not fully considered. We aimed to investigate the sex-specific associations of abdominal adipose with incident GERD.
methodsParticipants from the UK Biobank with complete data on magnetic resonance imaging-dervied visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT), and without GERD at the time of image assessment were included (N = 35,009; 52.11% female). Associations of VAT, ASAT, and several other derivative abdominal adipose-related indicators with incident GERD were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 4.44 years, 1,207 (3.45%) participants developed GERD. In females, when comparing the highest tertile with the lowest tertile, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 2.24 (95% CI, 1.81-2.77) for VAT and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.64-2.46) for ASAT. In males, only VAT (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.23-1.87) but not ASAT (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.96-1.42) was associated with an increased risk of GERD after full adjustment. For both VAT and ASAT, the incidence rate of GERD in the lowest tertile was higher in males, but their elevation clearly had a greater impact on GERD risk in females. Subgroup analyses indicated that effects of VAT and ASAT on GERD risk were more pronounced among younger individuals in females, and they were influenced by comorbidity status in both sexes.
conclusionsWe observed positive associations between abdominal adipose components and GERD in both sexes, which were stronger in females than males. Our findings provide evidence that gender may be a factor to be considered in the risk assessment and management of GERD, although validation in larger cohort of general populations is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.