ArticleLipids in health and disease2025
From guidelines to practice: LDL-C achievement in very high cardiovascular risk patients - analysis of the EDHIPO MARCA registry.
Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with dyslipidemia playing a key role in its progression. Despite advances in lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), LDL-C (Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) goal achievement remains suboptimal. This study evaluated LDL-C goal attainment in Colombian patients with very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) due to coronary artery disease (CAD) following ESC/EAS guidelines updates.
methodsEDHIPO MARCA (Evaluación De adherencia a la terapia HIPOlipemiante en pacientes de Muy Alto Riesgo CArdiovascular) is a retrospective, multicenter study assessing LDL-C goal achievement in patients with CAD. Data were collected from previous coronary angiogram reports and medical records across 11 Colombian healthcare institutions with certified interventional cardiology services. Patients with CAD who had at least one follow-up LDL-C measurement and an LLT prescription within 12 months post-angiogram were included. LDL-C goal attainment was assessed across three periods-2011-2012, 2016-2017, and 2021-2022-corresponding to the updates of ESC/EAS guidelines (2011, 2016, and 2019, respectively). The LDL-C goals were <70 mg/dL for the first two periods and <55 mg/dL for the most recent one. LDL-C was measured or estimated using the Friedewald equation. Descriptive analyses were performed.
resultsA total of 1,788 patients were included, with a median age of 66 years (IQR: 59-74), and 70.7% were male. Hypertension (67.5%) and overweight (40.8%) were the most common comorbidities. At discharge, statins were prescribed in 84.1% (95% CI: 82.4-85.8%) of patients, increasing to 99.1% (95% CI: 98.6-99.5%) at the end of follow-up (median 6.8 months); PCSK9 inhibitors were prescribed in 1.5%, exclusively in 2019. At the end of follow-up, 36.6% (95% CI: 34.3%, 38.8%) achieved LDL-C goals. By guideline period, goal attainment was 12.1% (95% CI: 5.4%, 18.8%) in 2011, 42.3% (95% CI: 37.9%, 46.8%) in 2016, and 36.2% (95% CI: 33.5%, 38.9%) in 2019. By number of follow-ups, LDL-C goal achievement increased from 32.9% (1 follow-up) to 44.0% (4 follow-ups).
conclusionsDespite widespread LLT use, LDL-C target achievement remains suboptimal. Frequent follow-up and greater use of combination therapy beyond statins may be essential to improve lipid control in very high CVR patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.