ArticleBMC nursing2025
Resilience and nursing care quality in emergency departments: a 2024 study in Kermanshah, Iran hospitals.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resilience, Well-Being, and Professional Practice Capabilities in New Graduate Nurses: A Longitudinal Mediation Study.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2026Article
- Impact of Quiet Quitting and Nursing Work Environment on Quality of Care and Patient Safety: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Nurses in Greece.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Organisational and Governance Conditions Shaping Psychological Safety and Structural Vulnerability in Float Pool Nursing: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Building Resilience in Emergency Care Teams: A Narrative Review of Team-Based and Organisational Strategies for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- The association between toxic leadership behaviors and nurses' career resilience: heterogeneous indirect roles of regulatory focus profiles.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency department (ED) nurses play a critical role in delivering urgent healthcare services and ensuring patient safety. The quality of nursing care in the ED significantly influences patient outcomes, satisfaction, and the overall performance of the healthcare system. Given the high-stress nature of the ED environment, nurses need to possess resilience—the capacity to adapt and cope effectively with challenging situations. This resilience is crucial for maintaining the well-being and professional satisfaction of ED nurses.
aimThis study aims to investigate the relationship between nursing care quality and resilience among ED nurses in educational hospitals in Kermanshah city, Iran, during the years 2023–2024
methodsThis descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 228 nurses working in the emergency departments of hospitals affiliated with Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and the Quality of Nursing Care (QUALPAC) questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25. The normality of the data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, which indicated a non-normal distribution of scores. Therefore, non-parametric tests, specifically the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, were used to compare groups. Relationships between variables were examined using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Additionally, stepwise multiple linear regression analysis controlling for confounding variables was conducted to identify predictors of nursing care quality.
resultsOut of 256 invited nurses, 228 completed valid questionnaires (response rate 89%). The mean age of participants was 29.5 ± 5.4 years. The mean nursing care quality score was 96.1 ± 17.0 (moderate level), and the mean resilience score was 66.7 ± 15.1. Nursing care quality scores differed significantly by gender (p = 0.007), age group (p = 0.007), and employment status (p = 0.001) but not by marital status (p = 0.563). Male nurses had higher nursing care quality scores (d = 0.39), while female nurses showed higher resilience (p = 0.001, d = 0.39). Spearman’s correlation showed significant positive associations between resilience and overall nursing care quality (r = 0.275), as well as its psychosocial (r = 0.280) and communication (r = 0.215) dimensions (all p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression controlling for gender, age, and employment status was significant (F = 10.210, p < 0.001), explaining 15.5% of the variance in nursing care quality. Resilience (β = 0.314, p < 0.001) and gender (β = 0.247, p < 0.001) were significant predictors. Age approached significance (β = −0.139, p = 0.051), while employment status was not a significant predictor (p = 0.961).
conclusionThis study demonstrated a significant positive association between resilience and the quality of nursing care among emergency department nurses. Enhancing resilience appears crucial for improving care quality and supporting nurses’ mental health in demanding clinical environments. Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate resilience-building strategies into nursing education and professional development programs. Additionally, organizational interventions aimed at fostering a supportive work environment and managing workload should be prioritized. Assigning more experienced nurses, particularly those over 30 years of age who exhibit higher resilience, to emergency departments may further promote care quality. These measures have the potential to improve both patient outcomes and workforce sustainability in high-pressure healthcare settings. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.