ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Multi-task machine learning for transfusion decision support in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a novel ensemble approach with clinical validation.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Hemostatic Decision-Making: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications and Implementation Barriers.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Transfusion Medicine: A Narrative Synthesis of Current Reviews.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study proposes a multi-task learning (MTL) model to predict the need for blood transfusion in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB), as well as to estimate the appropriate type and volume of transfusion. The proposed model demonstrates improved predictive performance over existing scoring systems and aims to support clinical decision-making in transfusion management.
methodsClinical data were retrospectively collected from 1256 emergency patients with AUGIB admitted to the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. An external validation cohort (n = 209) was sourced from Fenyang Hospital, Shanxi Province, using identical inclusion criteria. The MTL model integrates oversampling techniques and distribution correction to address data imbalance. A soft-voting ensemble of CatBoost and XGBoost classifiers was used for the classification task, while a stacked regressor combining random forest and XGBoost was employed for the regression task. Model performance was further optimized through a dynamically weighted loss function.
resultsIn the classification task, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.965, representing a 20.5% improvement over the traditional Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS). In the regression task, the two-stage stacked regressor (TSR) outperformed other machine learning models in predicting transfusion type and volume , significantly reducing the prediction error of transfusion volume. Compared to random forest (RF), XGBoost, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and backpropagation neural network (BP), the model reduced the overall loss by 9.9%, 21.0%, 38.3%, and 10.0%, respectively, validating the advantages of hierarchical feature selection and dynamic task-weighting. In the external validation set, the model exhibited favorable generalization performance with an AUC of 0.860, and showed good performance in infusion volume prediction error and weighted loss
conclusionsThis study presents a robust and interpretable multi-task learning model for transfusion decision-making in AUGIB. By jointly optimizing classification and regression tasks through hierarchical feature selection and dynamic loss allocation, the model supports precision transfusion strategies and holds strong potential for broader application in emergency and critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.