Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898430›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Shifting Expectations of Novel Immunotherapy Treatments in Oncology: Practitioners' and Patients' Calibration Work in Conditions of Uncertainty.

Julia Swallow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Julia SwallowSchool of Sociological Studies, Politics and International Relations, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9341-3239

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 218145/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy cancer treatments stimulate individuals' immune systems to target and kill cancer, with the potential to extend survival time for individuals living with some forms of advanced cancer. Immunotherapies, however, generate uncertainties in relation to predicting prognosis and managing toxicities and the emergence of side effects during and post-treatment. Drawing on interviews with practitioners and patients in an oncology clinic in the United Kingdom, this paper examines how these uncertainties, defined as epistemic and temporal, are articulated and negotiated in a wider context of shifting treatment expectations. Extending theorisation in the sociology of 'low' expectations, this paper demonstrates how practitioners and patients oscillate between high and low expectations of treatment to negotiate uncertainty. Patients are not passive consumers of hope and hype and do not always articulate high expectations of a pregiven and distant future, which requires recalibration in conditions of uncertainty. Instead, both practitioners and patients craft modest and personalised expectations and visions of the future, which at times involve anchoring to the present. Foregrounding both practitioners' and patients' accounts in theorising (re)calibration is important for understanding how expectations unfold and relate to uncertainties and with what consequences for the making of contemporary patienthood in the present.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelImmunotherapyMedical OncologyNeoplasmsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchUncertaintyUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40898430
PMCPMC12405668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.