SynthesisWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026
Treatment outcomes and safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus : Systematic review of real-world observational studies.
Synthesis in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Multiple Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSeveral pharmacotherapies are available to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among which sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are significant. The current systematic review aims to critically evaluate various clinical outcomes and safety profile of SGLT2is in comparison to GLP‑1 receptor agonists for the management of T2DM utilizing real-world clinical data.
methodsA total of 22,100 research articles were extracted from several electronic databases including EMBASE, PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to September 2024. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to maintain consistency and transparency in research. To obtain insights from the real-world clinical data, observational studies were used for this review, excluding , randomized controlled trials.
resultsThe pooled analysis showed that risk ratio (RR) of heart failure and MACE (major cardiovascular events) or revascularization, and odds ratio (OR) of renal outcomes were slightly higher among SGLT2is (experimental) as compared to GLP‑1 agonist (control). In addition, the pooled analysis of hypoglycemic events and all-cause mortalities favored SGLT2is as compared to GLP‑1 agonist.
conclusionSGLT2is appear to be more effective in lowering hospitalization for heart failure; GLP‑1 medication appears to be safer and more successful in treating MACE and improving renal outcomes. Occurrence of hypoglycemic events and the rate of all-cause mortality were found to be low in the SGLT2is group, which supported the clinical implication of SGLT2is.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40900212What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.