SynthesisArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2025
Applicability of Machine Learning Algorithms in Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation and LQTS by Electrocardiogram Interpretation: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applicability of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Arrhythmias - How Long Until The Machine Starts Teaching Us?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine Learning (ML) is a type of algorithm that autonomously learns to recognize complex patterns. In the diagnostic context of cardiac arrhythmias, these algorithms have shown significant advancements due to their ability to provide automated interpretation and pattern recognition in electrocardiograms (ECGs).
objectiveTo analyze and identify the applicability, validity, and feasibility of ML algorithm models in the diagnostic process of cardiac arrhythmias through automated electrocardiogram interpretation.
methodsThis systematic literature review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, and PubMed between February 2022 and November 2022. The study period encompasses articles published between 2017 and 2022.
resultsThe database search yielded 119 results, covering three subthemes: Long QT Syndrome (LQTS), corrected QT interval (QTc), and atrial fibrillation (AF). AF was the most prevalent theme. The sample sizes were quite variable. The outcomes were mostly satisfactory. In the diagnosis of LQTS using Artificial Intelligence (AI), the algorithm outperformed conventional methods in diagnostic distinction. In the evaluation of QTc, there was no difference between the AI-integrated ECG and the conventional ECG. In the diagnosis of AF, the algorithms, models, and devices demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, along with greater accuracy.
conclusionML models in the diagnostic process of cardiac arrhythmias are feasible and rapidly developing. They demonstrate accuracy values between 96.4% and 98.2%, sensitivity between 92.8% and 99.4%, and specificity between 95% and 98.1%, particularly in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.