ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Enhancing resistance training adherence in older adults with sarcopenia or osteoporosis: a study on referral success rates.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcopenia and osteoporosis increase the likelihood of disability and caregiving burden. While progressive resistance training (PRT) is effective in mitigating these outcomes, patients often struggle to find suitable, long-term training facilities, making it difficult to adhere to exercise prescriptions. Objectives: This feasibility study aimed to familiarize patients with PRT through educational training by a geriatrician, enabling them to identify a suitable long-term community-based training program. Participants and methods: Forty-one patients diagnosed with osteoporosis or sarcopenia at a medical center in Taiwan were enrolled via the researchers' LINE app platform. Finally, 11 participants with osteoporosis were recruited. Among them, four had vertebral compression fractures and two also met the diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia. The median age was 68 (range 63-69) years, DXA femoral neck T-score was -3.3 (-3.5--2.2), and grip strength was 22.4 (20.3-26.7) kg. After cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), participants received up to 10 PRT sessions, with vital signs monitored. In each session, researchers focused on six key learning points of free-weight PRT, addressed difficulties hindering progress, encouraged participants to find community-based training courses, and provided training summaries to external trainers. Descriptive statistics summarized patient data and referral rates. The primary outcome was the success of referrals to community-based training. Secondary outcomes, to be reported later, included changes in grip strength, DXA bone mineral density, DXA muscle mass, CPET results after 6 months, and sustainability of long-term resistance training (RT) in older people with osteoporosis or sarcopenia. Results: The recruitment success rate was 26.8%. Baseline characteristics did not correlate to successful referrals. A total of 67 physician-guided PRT sessions were conducted for the 11 participants. On average, after 4.5 in-hospital sessions, five participants secured self-paid one-on-one RT in the community, and one joined group training, resulting in a referral success rate of 54.5%. Conclusion: This feasibility study aimed at achieving successful referral for long-term community-based RT. It provides valuable insights for future research on RT for patients with osteoporosis or sarcopenia, making exercise a sustainable and quantifiable intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.