ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Bibliometric Study of the Evidence About Applying Virtual Reality in Mental Health Care.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual reality (VR) technology has gained much traction related to mental health owing to its interactive features and immersive nature. A systematic bibliometric evaluation is necessary to guide researchers in identifying emerging trends and research priorities in VR technology applications for mental health, highlighting evolving challenges and research needs. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the bibliometric characteristics and scope of evidence on the application of virtual reality in mental health care, synthesizing findings and exploring potential innovations. Methods: We conducted a bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace to examine 1333 articles from the Web of Science Core Collection (from January 1, 1999, to February 14, 2025), retrieved via the search query TS=("Mental health" AND "Virtual reality"). The study mapped key research trends, including international and institutional collaboration networks, author co-citation networks, and the evolution of keyword co-occurrence to identify influential contributors, thematic clusters, and emerging developments in VR-based mental health research. Results: The analysis revealed three key findings: (1) Exponential publication growth starting in 2020 with over 110 annual publications; (2) Robust collaboration networks featuring 3587 authors with Riva, G. as a central figure and the University of London as the most prominent institutional hub; (3) Virtual reality, exposure therapy, skin conductance, mild cognitive impairment, psychosis, augmented reality, and serious game are the main research clusters. Emergent word analysis of keywords from 2014 to early 2025 yielded 34 words/terms with the strongest citation bursts. Conclusion: This study demonstrates VR's integration with traditional therapy and its expanding role in treating diverse mental health conditions, from anxiety to schizophrenia. Future research should focus on standardizing treatments and validating their efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.