ReviewWorld journal of methodology2025
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic tumors: Current status and future perspectives.
Review in World journal of methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic ultrasonography ablation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic neoplasms present a significant therapeutic challenge due to their complex anatomy and poor prognosis. In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive therapeutic option, aiming to provide targeted treatment with improved patients' outcomes. This review aims to shed light on current evidence about the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of EUS-RFA in the management of pancreatic neoplasms. We conducted a comprehensive search of literature, reviewing studies that document the application of EUS-RFA in pancreatic masses. The key metrics for efficacy included tumor size reduction, pain relief, and overall survival, while safety outcomes focused on procedural complications and post-operative recovery. EUS-RFA has demonstrated potential in effectively managing both benign and malignant pancreatic neoplasms, with several studies reporting significant reductions in tumor size and symptomatic relief. The technique is associated with a favorable safety profile, characterized by a low incidence of major complications. EUS-RFA represents a valuable addition to the therapeutic arsenal for pancreatic neoplasms, offering a viable alternative to surgical interventions, especially in patients with contraindications for surgery. Further studies are needed to establish standardized protocols and long-term outcomes, enhancing its applicability and success in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.