ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Comparative efficacy of sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors on lipid profiles in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a comprehensive Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global health concern associated with dyslipidemia, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), necessitating effective therapeutic strategies. Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have shown promise in improving metabolic parameters, but their comparative efficacy in NAFLD remains unclear. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 31 December 2024, involving NAFLD patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus placebo or standard treatments. Outcomes included changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, BMI, and HbA1c. A Bayesian NMA was performed using a random-effects model, with mean differences (MD) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) reported. Treatments were ranked using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) scores. Results: We evaluated and compared the efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors in improving lipid profiles (LDL-C, HDL-C, total cholesterol, and triglycerides), BMI, and HbA1c in patients with NAFLD. Eleven RCTs involving 805 patients were included. Empagliflozin achieved the greatest LDL-C reduction (MD: -8.07 mg/dL, 95% CrI: -25.92 to 1.41; SUCRA: 95.38%), total cholesterol reduction (MD: -15.08 mg/dL, 95% CrI: -58.87 to 5.38; SUCRA: 94.32%), and HbA1c reduction (MD: -0.69%, 95% CrI: -1.52 to -0.06; SUCRA: 81.84%). Ipragliflozin non-significantly increased HDL-C (MD: 2.28 mg/dL, 95% CrI: -1.21 to 4.83; SUCRA: 85.11%) and significantly reduced triglyceride (MD: -22.39 mg/dL, 95% CrI: -39.25 to -7.27; SUCRA: 82.26%). Dapagliflozin resulted in significant BMI reduction (MD: -1.23 kg/m Conclusion: Empagliflozin and ipragliflozin demonstrated superior efficacy in improving lipid profiles, while dapagliflozin was most effective for BMI reduction in NAFLD patients. These findings align with their cardiovascular and metabolic benefits, offering a multifaceted approach to a complex disease. Further research is needed to confirm long-term effects and optimize treatment strategies for diverse NAFLD populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.