ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Association between the body roundness index and chronic pain among adults in the United States: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic pain is a significant public health concern in the United States. Obesity is associated with chronic pain. The body mass index may not accurately assess the health risks of obesity, and the body roundness index (BRI), a novel anthropometric indicator, may be more appropriate. However, the association between the BRI and chronic pain has not been validated. Therefore, this study examined the association between the BRI and chronic pain among adults in the United States. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from adult participants in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Chronic pain was defined as self-reported pain lasting 3 months or more in the past year. The BRI was calculated using height and waist circumference. Multivariable logistic regression models and restricted cubic splines were used to assess the association between the BRI and chronic pain. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore confounder effects. Results: Of the 11,599 participants aged 20 years or older, 1690 (15.92%) had chronic pain. In fully adjusted models, the BRI was positively associated with chronic pain [odds ratio (OR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.09]. Compared with participants in the lowest BRI quintile (Q1), those in the highest quintile (Q5) had an adjusted OR of 1.28 (95% CI = 1.07-1.54) for chronic pain. The multivariable restricted cubic spline showed a nonlinear association between the BRI and chronic pain. In two piecewise regression models, participants with BRI ≥ 4.63 had an adjusted OR of 1.07 (95% CI = 1.00-1.13) for chronic pain; however, no correlation was observed for participants with the BRI < 4.63. Further subgroup analyses revealed no significant interactions between these variables. Conclusion: Higher BRI was associated with an increased risk of chronic pain, indicating that the BRI was a significant risk factor. Therefore, regular monitoring and preventive measures are required to maintain optimal BRI levels and prevent chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.