ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Inflammatory blood markers in breast cancer: a narrative review from early detection to therapy response.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Enhanced predictive value of post-treatment lymphocyte-based immunoinflammatory biomarkers for cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in anthracycline-treated breast cancer patients.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Circulating Lipid Peroxides Associate with More Aggressive Tumor Phenotypes and Increased Risks of Recurrence and Mortality in Breast Cancer Patients.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Inflammatory Footprint of Anti-Breast Cancer Treatments and Psychosocial Factors in Women Undergoing Chemotherapy.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide, with early detection and accurate prognostication crucial for improving survival outcomes. While imaging and histopathological analyses are standard diagnostic tools, there is growing interest in cost-effective, minimally invasive biomarkers that can complement existing modalities - particularly in resource-limited settings. This narrative review explores the role of inflammatory blood markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), in breast cancer detection, prognosis, and monitoring of therapeutic response. These markers, derived from routine complete blood counts, reflect the systemic immune landscape and are increasingly associated with tumor progression, treatment resistance, and survival. We also highlight the limitations of these markers, particularly their non-specificity, and compare their utility with established diagnostic and molecular techniques. While not diagnostic alone, these inflammatory indices may serve as adjuncts in clinical decision-making and merit further validation in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.