Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901231›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

High Blood Pressure Among Emergency Department Patients: Effects of Educational Intervention.

Catherine A Marco, Grace Wang, Gavin Schaefer-Hood, Matthew Turner, Matthew Egner, Alexander Haynos, Caroline Soderman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine A MarcoEmergency Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Grace WangEmergency Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Gavin Schaefer-HoodEmergency Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Matthew TurnerEmergency Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Matthew EgnerEmergency Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Alexander HaynosEmergency Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Caroline SodermanEmergency Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Hypertension is a significant global health issue. It is estimated that approximately half of adults in the United States have hypertension (approximately 119 million adults). Although emergent treatment is not indicated for asymptomatic hypertension, patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hypertension may represent an opportunity for patient education and improved health outcomes. This study was undertaken to identify healthcare outcomes associated with an educational intervention for patients presenting to the ED with hypertension. Methods In this prospective interventional study, subjects included consenting adult Emergency Department (ED) patients with hypertension (defined by the International Society of Hypertension as systolic blood pressure (BP) over 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP over 90 mm Hg), who were discharged home. Baseline assessment of medication adherence, exercise, diet, tobacco, and alcohol use was performed. An educational intervention was provided using the American Heart Association: Blood Pressure Fact Sheets. Subjects were contacted at two and four weeks following the ED visit to assess BP, medication adherence, exercise, diet, and tobacco and alcohol use. Results Among 151 participants, data were available at two weeks for 89 subjects (59% follow-up rate). Following the educational intervention, participants had lower systolic BP at two weeks (baseline mean: 163 mm Hg (95% CI: 159-166), two-week mean: 130 mm Hg (95% CI: 126-135); p < 0.001) and diastolic BP at two weeks (baseline mean: 93 (95% CI: 91-95); two-week mean: 77 mmHg (95% CI: 75-80); p < 0.001). Participants were more likely to take antihypertensive medication daily at two weeks (baseline: 52%; two-week mean: 69%; p = 0.0271). There was no significant difference in self-reported healthy diet (baseline: 21%; two-week mean: 26%; p = 0.1). There was no significant difference in self-reported exercise (baseline: 30%; two-week mean: 26%; p = 0.8). There were no differences in smoking or alcohol use at two weeks. Similar results were found at four weeks. Data were available at four weeks post intervention for 88 subjects (58.2% follow-up rate). At four weeks, participants had a lower systolic BP (baseline: 163 mmHg (95% CI: 159-166); four-week mean: 132; p < 0.001) and lower diastolic BP (baseline: 93 mmHg (95% CI: 91-95); four-week mean: 78; p < 0.001). A significant difference in self-reported exercise emerged at four weeks, with a lower percentage reporting no exercise (baseline reporting no exercise: 30%; four-week mean: 18%, p = 0.0348). There were no significant differences in reported healthy diet adherence (baseline: 21%; four-week mean: 24%; p = 0.6705), smoking (baseline: 11.92%; four-week mean: 5.68%; p = 0.1147), or alcohol use (baseline: 34%; four-week mean: 28%; p = 0.3361). Conclusions An educational intervention in the ED was associated with lower systolic and diastolic BP at two and four weeks post ED visit, improved medication adherence at two and four weeks, and self-reported exercise at four weeks. There were no differences in reported healthy diet adherence, exercise, smoking, or alcohol use.

Indexed as

educationemergencyhigh blood pressurehypertensionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID40901231
PMCPMC12400780

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.