Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901244›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Current status and further directions of endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound-directed transenteric ERCP in the management of pancreaticobiliary diseases in surgically altered anatomy: a comprehensive review.

Giuseppe Dell'Anna, Angelo Bruni, Jacopo Fanizza, Paolo Biamonte, Sarah Bencardino, Francesco Vito Mandarino, Ernesto Fasulo, Alberto Barchi, Camilla Gallo, Jahnvi Dhar and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Giuseppe Dell'AnnaGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9395-5468
Angelo BruniGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Jacopo FanizzaGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Paolo BiamonteGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Sarah BencardinoGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Francesco Vito MandarinoGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Ernesto FasuloGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BarchiGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Camilla GalloDigestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7598-7220
Jahnvi DharDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Punjab Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Jayanta SamantaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Antonio FacciorussoGastroenterology Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Ivo BoskoskiDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training and Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma (Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome), Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-2670
Sara MassironiGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Vito AnneseGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Alberto MalesciGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo FuccioGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (IRCCS University Hospital of Bologna), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrew A GumbsDepartment of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Hospital Antoine Beclère, Assistance Publique-Hospitals of Paris, Clamart, France.
Silvio DaneseGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Gianfranco DonatelliUnité d'Endoscopie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Privé des Peupliers, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE) and endoscopic ultrasound-directed transenteric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDEE) are innovative endoscopic techniques developed to overcome the challenges of biliary access in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. EDGE facilitates the creation of a gastro-gastric anastomosis, enabling endoscopic access to the excluded stomach and subsequent duodenum for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. Similarly, EDEE involves creating a gastro-jejunal anastomosis, allowing endoscopic access to the jejunum and hepaticojejunostomy for ERCP. These procedures are primarily indicated for patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or other complex gastrointestinal surgeries that render traditional ERCP unfeasible. The major advantages of EDGE and EDEE include minimally invasive access to the biliary system, reduced procedural morbidity, and the ability to perform complex biliary interventions without additional surgeries. Using lumen-apposing metal stents in these procedures has further improved their safety and efficacy. This comprehensive review delves into EDGE and EDEE's technical nuances, clinical outcomes, and safety profiles. Our extensive literature searches reveal high procedural success rates and low complication incidences, establishing these methods as viable alternatives to traditional surgical and percutaneous approaches. We also discuss recent technological advancements, including developing enhanced stents and endoscopic ultrasound-guided instruments, which have refined these techniques and expanded their applications. Moreover, the review examines the integration of EDGE and EDEE with other therapeutic modalities, such as cholangioscopy and intraductal lithotripsy, to optimize treatment outcomes. Future directions emphasize the need for larger, multicenter trials to validate these findings further and create standardized protocols to ensure consistent procedural efficacy and safety. This review highlights the transformative potential of EDGE and EDEE in therapeutic endoscopy, advocating for their broader adoption in clinical practice and ongoing innovation in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasound-directed transenteric ERCP (EDEE)endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE)endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)surgically altered anatomy (SAA)therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (T-EUS)

Identifiers

PMID40901244
PMCPMC12399817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.