ReviewCureus2025
Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin Versus Other Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors) are used as second-line drugs in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. They act by preventing the breakdown of incretin hormones, which enhance insulin secretion and reduce glucagon secretion. Vildagliptin and sitagliptin are more commonly used DPP-4 inhibitors. In recent years, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors has been increasing; hence, it is important to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of this medication with available evidence. Moreover, this systematic review will evaluate to look for any specific superiority or safety advantage of using Vildagliptin over other DPP-4 inhibitors. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review search with Cochrane and PubMed databases. Two independent reviewers examined randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies against the inclusion criteria. Excluded studies involve type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes, and severe acute diabetic complications. Finally, five RCT studies were chosen, involving 296 participants overall. Baseline and outcome values with p-values and intergroup differences with their p-value from original studies were gathered to evaluate the significance of using vildagliptin over DPP-4 inhibitors, and findings were provided in a narrative way with available evidence. All five RCT studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline, ranging from -0.3 to -1.34 with p-value <0.05 in the vildagliptin group and -0.1 to -1.07 with p-value >0.05 in other DPP-4 inhibitors, with no significant intergroup differences indicating comparable efficacy between vildagliptin and other DPP-4 inhibitors. Similarly, no significant intergroup differences were observed between vildagliptin and comparator agents in reducing fasting plasma glucose and postprandial glucose. Notably, one study reported a significant reduction favoring vildagliptin, while another showed a greater reduction of FPG with alogliptin; however, intergroup comparisons were not statistically significant. In addition, vildagliptin did not show consistent improvement in lipid profile across the involved studies. Vildagliptin showed a low incidence of hypoglycemic events in comparison with other DPP-4 inhibitors. Overall, this systematic review found no significant superiority of vildagliptin over other DPP-4 inhibitors such as sitagliptin and alogliptin in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, whether used as monotherapy or in combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.