ReviewERJ open research2025
Viruses in bronchiectasis.
Review in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tackling NHS winter pressures due to respiratory disease: the UK Centre for Applied Respiratory Research Innovation and Impact (CARRii).NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Review
- Association Between Respiratory Viral Infection and Peripheral T Lymphocyte Subsets in Elderly Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Bronchiectasis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Bacterial Isolates from Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Pediatric Patients with Protracted Bacterial Bronchitis or Bronchiectasis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Inflammatory Phenotypes of Bronchiectasis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Microbiome and its role in bronchiectasis.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory condition characterised by irreversible dilation of the bronchi, leading to recurrent respiratory infections and chronic inflammation. Bacterial infections have been well-recognised as contributors to disease progression as well as potent inducers of exacerbations for decades. However, recent studies have indicated that viruses are present in up to 50% of exacerbations, raising questions over the role viruses may play in bronchiectasis. Despite the evidence of their presence, the role of viral infections in bronchiectasis remains largely underexplored. Understanding how viruses impact bronchiectasis is crucial in providing patients with better care and treatment strategies. Given the persistent threat of viral infections, as highlighted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge surrounding viruses in bronchiectasis, how they may trigger exacerbations and insights from other chronic respiratory conditions where the role of viruses is better understood.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.