ArticleJournal of analytical methods in chemistry2025
Ultrasound-Assisted Enzymatic Extraction of Mangiferin From Mango (
Article in Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainable Extraction of Mangiferin From Mango Leaves Using Taguchi and Box-Behnken Optimization: Biochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Profiling.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mango peel is one of the main byproducts in mango processing. In order to improve the utilization and added-value of mango peel, effects of the ultrasound-assisted enzymatic method on the extraction rate of mangiferin from mango peel were investigated by single-factor tests (enzyme addition amount, enzymolysis time, ethanol concentration, ultrasonic temperature, ultrasonic power, and ultrasonic time), and the extraction process was optimized by Box-Behnken response surface. The antioxidant activity and antidiabetic assay of mangiferin in vitro were studied. The results showed that enzymolysis time 44 min, enzyme addition amount 0.1%, ethanol concentration 70%, ultrasonic power 300 W, ultrasonic temperature 66°C, and ultrasonic time 45 min were the optimal extraction process parameters. Under these conditions, the extraction rate of mangiferin was 3.63% ± 0.04%, which was not significantly different from the model prediction value (3.71%), and it was 3.90 times and 1.78 times that of single cellulase and ultrasonic extraction, respectively. Within the test concentration range, the scavenging rate of mangiferin for DPPH·, ABTS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.