ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Navigating challenges in hydrocephalus following intraventricular hemorrhage: a comprehensive review of current evidence.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active Cerebrospinal Fluid Exchange Versus External Ventricular Drainage in IVH and SAH: A Meta-Analysis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Intracranial pressure management in severe intraventricular hemorrhage: A minireview.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Branch-Critical Clipping of a Ruptured Carotid-Posterior Communicating Aneurysm with Fetal PCA Configuration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trans-sylvian hematoma evacuation combined with lamina terminalis ventriculostomy for hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Iron-driven secondary injury after intracranial hemorrhage: mitochondrial dysfunction and ferroptosis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrocephalus following intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a complex neurological condition resulting from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation disruptions due to intraventricular blood entry. This review synthesizes current evidence on pathophysiology, mechanisms, and treatment strategies. Following IVH, erythrocyte lysis releases hemoglobin and iron, triggering oxidative stress and ferroptosis, while thrombin activation, TGF-β1-mediated fibrosis, inflammatory cascades, and ependymal damage collectively contribute to ventricular enlargement. Key animal models elucidate roles of oxidative stress, cytokines, and complement activation in IVH-induced injury. We highlight evolving insights into CSF absorption pathways and blood metabolite interactions, alongside persistent clinical challenges including delayed diagnosis and therapeutic limitations. Experimental approaches such as thrombolytics, iron chelators, and inflammatory inhibitors show preclinical potential but face significant translational barriers: thrombolytics reduced mortality in the CLEAR III trial yet failed to improve functional outcomes or shunt dependence; iron chelation lacks robust clinical validation; and TGF-β1 inhibition yields conflicting efficacy across models. Future research must address the interplay of blood components, inflammatory mediators, and structural damage, prioritizing biomarker discovery and rigorously validated therapeutic innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.