Trial reportPloS one2025
Early childhood caries intervention in Aboriginal Australian children: Follow-up at child age 9 years.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDental caries is one of the most common preventable diseases among Indigenous children. The study aimed to estimate the efficacy of an Early Childhood Caries (ECC) intervention among Aboriginal Australian children over 9 years, and to explore potential risk factors associated with dental caries among Indigenous Australian children.
methodsData were from a randomized controlled trial conducted in South Australia, Australia. Four hundred and forty-eight women pregnant with an Aboriginal child were randomly allocated to either an immediate (II) or delayed (DI) intervention group between January 2011 and May 2012. The immediate intervention comprised (1) provision of dental care to mothers during pregnancy; (2) application of fluoride varnish to teeth of children at ages 6, 12; and 18 months; (3) motivational interviewing delivered in conjunction with; and (4) anticipatory guidance. Mothers/children in the DI group received the same intervention commencing at child aged 2 years. Follow-ups occurred when children were aged 2-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 9-years. In this analysis, outcomes were severity of caries experience: mean dmft/DMFT at child aged 9 years. Dependent variables included mothers' baseline and seven years follow-up characteristics (age, education level, source of income, residential location, smoking and alcohol status) and children's birth and feeding, and dental behaviours characteristics (sex, gestation, birth weight, breastfeeding status and sweet food consumption, and frequency of tooth brushing). Multivariable log-Poisson regression models with robust standard error estimation were applied as a statistical model to estimate multivariable relationships of dental caries and other covariates. Risk ratios (RRs) with their 95%CI were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by using the inverse-probability-of censoring weighting (IPCW) to overcome the loss-follow-up issues.
resultsData were available for 367 (II = 180 and DI = 187) children at age 9 years. The mean dmft was 3.41 (95% CI: 2.95-3.87) and DMFT was 0.31(95%CI: 0.22-0.41). In multivariable modelling, mean dmft was higher (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.26) among DI children than II children, but there were no significant differences in the permanent dentition. Risk factors for caries severity in both the primary and permanent dentition included lower mothers' education level (<12 years level: dmft; RR = 1.56, 95% CI:1.31-1.86; and 'Trade or TAFT: DMFT: RR =3.40, 95%CI: 1.16-9.98). Other risk factors for dental caries experience in the primary dentition included preterm birth, low birth weight, child not breastfed and sugar consumption more than 10%, and in permanent dentition was self-rated 'fair/poor' or 'Good' children's oral health, compared with self-rated 'Excellent/very good' oral health.
conclusionThe present study suggests that, within this cohort, initiating an early childhood caries intervention during pregnancy and infancy may be associated with lower caries experience in the primary dentition by age 9 years compared to a later start. Low maternal education level was associated with caries severity in both primary and permanent dentitions. Sugar consumption, a modifiable risk factor, greater than 10% was an important contributor to dental caries in primary teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.