ArticlePloS one2025
Cheminformatics-based screening and evaluation of phytochemicals as CDK2 inhibitors in colorectal cancer therapy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quercetin derivatives from Camellia sinensis for the discovery of anticancer compound against P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance: a computational approach.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- From sea to cure: Discovery of marine-derived therapeutics against Fusarium solani in shrimps for enhancing aquaculture sustainability.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health issue. It ranks as the third most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Among the molecular factors driving its progression, cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) plays a key role. CDK2 is a protein kinase essential for regulating the cell cycle, and its dysregulation is implicated in the development of various cancers, notably CRC. Fruquintinib is an already available drug against CRC. However, this study is being performed in search of better drug-like compounds. Some studies have shown that phytochemicals are less toxic and have fewer adverse effects than commercially available medications. With the vision of detecting CDK2 inhibitors, phytochemicals with anticancer activity can be used as alternatives to develop the drug candidate. Cheminformatics-based analysis is used for this purpose. This approach includes molecular docking, adsorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion/toxicity (ADME/T), post-docking molecular mechanism generalized born surface area (MM-GBSA), structural activity relationship (SAR), frontier molecular orbital (FMO), and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Molecular docking was employed to determine the binding strength of 4433 phytochemicals with anti-cancer properties sourced from the IMPPAT database. The top five candidates, CIDs-135438111, 6474893, 44257567, 10469828, and 353825, were selected based on their docking scores. Later, three lead compounds, CIDs-6474893, 10469828, and 135438111, were finalized depending on their favorable ADME/T profiles. All three selected pharmaceuticals demonstrated excellent post-dock MM-GBSA scores and HOMO-LUMO energy gaps, which served as confirmation of their efficacy and safety. The SAR analysis also revealed anti-mutagenic, antineoplastic, and apoptosis-inducing properties of the compounds. Finally, the rigidity of the protein-ligand complex structures was verified by MD simulations. Overall, the study suggests these three phytochemicals exhibit stronger binding and better pharmacological profiles than the control (fruquintinib), offering a promising direction for CRC treatment development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.