Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901873›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Nonlinear memory in cell-division dynamics across species.

Shijie Zhang, Chenyi Fei, Jörn Dunkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shijie Zhang *Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0009-0003-2254-4105
Chenyi Fei *Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Jörn DunkelDepartment of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0001-8865-2369

Funding

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (APSF) G-2021-16758MathWorks (The MathWorks, Inc.) MathWorks ProfessorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) DMR/MPS- 221402Schmidt Futures (Schmidt Futures Projects, LLC) Polymath Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation of cell growth and division is essential to achieve cell-size homeostasis. Recent advances in imaging technologies, such as "mother machines" for bacteria or yeast, have allowed long-term tracking of cell-size dynamics across many generations, and thus have brought major insights into the mechanisms underlying cell-size control. However, understanding the governing rules of cell growth and division within a quantitative dynamical-systems framework remains a major challenge. Here, we implement and apply a framework that makes it possible to infer stochastic-differential-equation models with Poisson noise directly from experimentally measured time series for cellular growth and division. To account for potential nonlinear memory effects, we parameterize the Poisson intensity of stochastic cell-division events in terms of both the cell's current size and its ancestral history. By applying the algorithm to experimentally measured cell-size trajectories, we are able to quantitatively evaluate the linear one-step memory hypothesis underlying the popular "sizer," "adder," and "timer" models of cell homeostasis. For

Indexed as

Cell DivisionModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsAlgorithmsBacillus subtilisDictyosteliumEscherichia coliHomeostasisSchizosaccharomycesSpecies SpecificityStochastic ProcessesBayesian inferencecell divisioncellular memorystochastic dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40901873
PMCPMC12435308

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.