ArticlePloS one2025
Improving the accuracy of cybersecurity spam email detection using ensemble techniques: A stacking approach Machine learning for spam email detection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of internet technologies and email communication systems, the exponential growth in email usage has precipitated a corresponding surge in spam proliferation. These unsolicited messages not only consume users' valuable time through information overload but also pose significant cybersecurity threats through malware distribution and phishing schemes, thereby jeopardizing both digital security and user experience. This emerging challenge underscores the critical importance of developing effective spam detection mechanisms as a cornerstone of modern cybersecurity infrastructure. Through empirical analysis of machine learning (ML) performance on publicly available spam datasets, we established that algorithmic ensemble methods consistently outperform individual models in detection accuracy. We propose an optimized stacking ensemble framework that strategically combines predictions from four heterogeneous base models (NBC, k-NN, LR, XGBoost) through meta-learner integration. Our methodology incorporates grid search cross-validation with hyperparameter space optimization, enabling systematic identification of parameter configurations that maximize detection performance. The enhanced model was rigorously evaluated using comprehensive metrics including accuracy (99.79%), precision, recall, and F1-score, demonstrating statistically significant improvements over both baseline models and existing solutions documented in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.