Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40901898›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Improving the accuracy of cybersecurity spam email detection using ensemble techniques: A stacking approach Machine learning for spam email detection.

Ye Tian, Xin Dai, Zhijun Li, Hong Guo, Xiao Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ye TianAcademy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2428-2582
Xin DaiCiticbank Software Development Center, Beijing, China.
Zhijun LiAcademy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.
Hong GuoAcademy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.
Xiao MaoAcademy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the widespread adoption of internet technologies and email communication systems, the exponential growth in email usage has precipitated a corresponding surge in spam proliferation. These unsolicited messages not only consume users' valuable time through information overload but also pose significant cybersecurity threats through malware distribution and phishing schemes, thereby jeopardizing both digital security and user experience. This emerging challenge underscores the critical importance of developing effective spam detection mechanisms as a cornerstone of modern cybersecurity infrastructure. Through empirical analysis of machine learning (ML) performance on publicly available spam datasets, we established that algorithmic ensemble methods consistently outperform individual models in detection accuracy. We propose an optimized stacking ensemble framework that strategically combines predictions from four heterogeneous base models (NBC, k-NN, LR, XGBoost) through meta-learner integration. Our methodology incorporates grid search cross-validation with hyperparameter space optimization, enabling systematic identification of parameter configurations that maximize detection performance. The enhanced model was rigorously evaluated using comprehensive metrics including accuracy (99.79%), precision, recall, and F1-score, demonstrating statistically significant improvements over both baseline models and existing solutions documented in the literature.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityElectronic MailMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40901898
PMCPMC12407460

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.