ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Interpretable Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Migraine Classification: Quantitative Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Two-decade dialogue between artificial intelligence and osteoporosis: research trajectories and frontier projections under bibliometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in migraine: a narrative review on the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications.Oxford open neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning has demonstrated significant potential in advancing computer-aided diagnosis for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as migraine, enabling patient-specific diagnosis at an individual level. However, despite the superior accuracy of deep learning models, the interpretability of image classification models remains limited. Their black-box nature continues to pose a major obstacle in clinical applications, hindering biomarker discovery and personalized treatment.
objectiveThis study aims to investigate explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques combined with multiple functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) indicators to (1) compare their efficacy in migraine classification, (2) identify optimal model-indicator pairings, and (3) evaluate XAI's potential in clinical diagnostics by localizing discriminative brain regions.
methodsWe analyzed resting-state fMRI data from 64 participants, including 21 (33%) patients with migraine without aura, 15 (23%) patients with migraine with aura, and 28 (44%) healthy controls. Three fMRI metrics-amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation, regional homogeneity, and regional functional connectivity strength (RFCS)-were extracted and classified using GoogleNet, ResNet18, and Vision Transformer. For comprehensive model comparison, conventional machine learning methods, including support vector machine and random forest, were also used as benchmarks. Model performance was evaluated through accuracy and area under the curve metrics, while activation heat maps were generated via gradient-weighted class activation mapping for convolutional neural networks and self-attention mechanisms for Vision Transformer.
resultsThe GoogleNet model combined with RFCS indicators achieved the best classification performance, with an accuracy of >98.44% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.99 for the test set. In addition, among the 3 indicators, the RFCS indicator improved accuracy by approximately 8% compared with the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation. Brain activation heat maps generated by XAI technology revealed that the precuneus and cuneus were the most discriminative brain regions, with slight activation also observed in the frontal gyrus.
conclusionsThe use of XAI technology combined with brain region features provides visual explanations for the progression of migraine in patients. Understanding the decision-making process of the network has significant potential for clinical diagnosis of migraines, offering promising applications in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and aiding in the development of new diagnostic techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.