ArticleEBioMedicine2025
A sensitive and specific non-invasive urine biomarker panel for prostate cancer detection.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Evaluation of Biological Techniques.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Urinary Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) as a Noninvasive Biomarker for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With Equivocal PSA Levels.BioMed research international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading causes of cancer death in men. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is widely used for screening, its diagnostic accuracy is limited, often failing to distinguish between benign and malignant prostate conditions, underscoring the need for novel biomarkers with improved diagnostic performance. This study aimed to identify and validate a panel of urinary RNA biomarkers with improved diagnostic accuracy for PCa.
methodsRNA-sequencing analysis of exfoliated cells in urine specimens identified 50 candidate RNAs. After initial qPCR testing in pooled urine, three biomarkers (TTC3, H4C5, EPCAM) with optimal specificity and sensitivity were selected as a biomarker panel. Diagnostic performance was evaluated in a case-control study divided into development (n = 243 participants) and validation (n = 646 participants) datasets. Biomarker expression was confirmed in tissue specimens, and the oncogenic function of TTC3 was assessed in vitro and in vivo.
findingsThe three-biomarker urine panel robustly identified PCa with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98) compared to 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88) for urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) RNA in the development dataset and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94) compared to 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.80) for PCA3 in the validation dataset. Urine biomarkers were nearly eliminated post-prostatectomy and were confirmed to originate from prostate tissue at both the RNA and protein levels. The panel maintained high diagnostic accuracy of PSA-negative PCa cases and distinguished PCa from benign prostate conditions (BPH, prostatitis). Functional studies demonstrated that TTC3 depletion significantly suppressed in vitro and in vivo tumour growth.
interpretationThis urine-based biomarker panel offers a promising sensitive and specific noninvasive diagnostic for PCa with the potential to form the basis for laboratory-developed and in vitro diagnostic assays.
fundingThis study was supported by the International Prostate Cancer Foundation, JHU SKCCC (grant number P30CA006973), and Bankhead-Coley Cancer Research Program (grant number 24B16) to R. J. Perera and by the Maryland Innovation Initiative Grant to C. P. Pavlovich and R. J. Perera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.