ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2025
Comparative Assessment of Whole Organ Tissue Processing Methods for the Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles From Intact Organs.
Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exosome Secretion Drives Chemo-Resistance of Temozolomide in Glioblastoma.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- Comparative Assessment of Whole Organ Tissue Processing Methods for the Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles From Intact Organs.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small anuclear cellular membrane encapsulated fragments of importance for cellular interaction and transfer of information. These small vesicles, diverse in size and functionality, can be obtained from cells, tissues and bodily fluids. A complicated step for obtaining EVs from whole organs is understanding the optimal methodology for organ processing. In this study, we have examined two different techniques: one enzymatic and one novel non-enzymatic automated tissue dissociation (ATD) machine. Animals were perfused, organs extracted, and techniques comparatively applied. We have used these techniques for organ-based dissociation followed by EV isolation from the dissociated tissues (heart, kidney, lung). While both approaches allow isolation of intact EVs there are distinct differences in overall cell and particle yields. Our study highlights tissue specific inter-organ variability and differential impact of dissociation strategies on organ-based EV profiles, as well as cellular characteristics. Our findings indicate that EV yields and characteristics varies between enzymatic and ATD techniques as well as between organs with highest EV yield obtained from kidneys following enzymatic dissociation. Our findings can be rapidly transferred to other setups or developed to enable enumeration and characterization of EVs obtained from whole organs in physiological and pathological settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.