Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40903824›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2025

Comparative Assessment of Whole Organ Tissue Processing Methods for the Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles From Intact Organs.

Mohammed Tayab Hussain, Shani Austin-Williams, Joel McCay, Hedayatullah Hayat, Thomas D Wright, Marilena Christoforou, Ella Ykema, Mauro Perretti, Dianne Cooper, Andreas Margraf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohammed Tayab HussainCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Shani Austin-WilliamsCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Joel McCayCentre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2486-3655
Hedayatullah HayatCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Thomas D WrightCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Marilena ChristoforouCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ella YkemaCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Mauro PerrettiCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Dianne CooperCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Andreas MargrafCentre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-6478

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/4yPhD/F/21/34161Centre of Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis versus Arthritis and Centre for Innovation and Therapeutic Innovation Ph.D. studentship 21621Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 460682455Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MA9604/1-1Lorna and Yuti Chernajovsky Biomedical Research Foundation PhD studentshipQMUL and Barts charity grant MGU0509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small anuclear cellular membrane encapsulated fragments of importance for cellular interaction and transfer of information. These small vesicles, diverse in size and functionality, can be obtained from cells, tissues and bodily fluids. A complicated step for obtaining EVs from whole organs is understanding the optimal methodology for organ processing. In this study, we have examined two different techniques: one enzymatic and one novel non-enzymatic automated tissue dissociation (ATD) machine. Animals were perfused, organs extracted, and techniques comparatively applied. We have used these techniques for organ-based dissociation followed by EV isolation from the dissociated tissues (heart, kidney, lung). While both approaches allow isolation of intact EVs there are distinct differences in overall cell and particle yields. Our study highlights tissue specific inter-organ variability and differential impact of dissociation strategies on organ-based EV profiles, as well as cellular characteristics. Our findings indicate that EV yields and characteristics varies between enzymatic and ATD techniques as well as between organs with highest EV yield obtained from kidneys following enzymatic dissociation. Our findings can be rapidly transferred to other setups or developed to enable enumeration and characterization of EVs obtained from whole organs in physiological and pathological settings.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesAnimalsKidneyLungMaleMiceMyocardiumRatsdigestdisruptionextracellular vesiclesorgan isolation

Identifiers

PMID40903824
PMCPMC12408365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.