Evidence mapPaperPMID 40904504Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Artificial intelligence in advanced gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of applications in precision oncology.

Min Fu, Jialing Xu, Yingying Lv, Baijun Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Min FuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.
Jialing XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.
Yingying LvDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.
Baijun JinDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major global health challenge, particularly in its advanced stages where prognosis is poor, and treatment responses are heterogeneous. Precision oncology aims to tailor therapies, but current biomarkers have limitations. Artificial Intelligence (AI), encompassing machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), offers powerful tools to analyze complex, multi-dimensional data from advanced GC patients, including clinical records, genomics, imaging (radiomics), and digital pathology (pathomics). This review synthesizes the current state of AI applications in unresectable, advanced GC. AI models demonstrate significant potential in refining diagnosis and staging, predicting treatment efficacy for chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies, and assessing prognosis. Multi-modal AI approaches, integrating data from diverse sources, consistently show improved predictive performance over single-modality models, better reflecting the complexity of the disease. Key challenges remain, including data quality and standardization, model generalizability and interpretability, and the need for rigorous prospective validation. Future directions emphasize multi-center collaborations, development of robust and explainable AI (XAI), and seamless integration into clinical workflows. Overcoming these hurdles will be crucial to translate AI's potential into tangible clinical benefits, enabling truly personalized and effective management for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Indexed as

advanced gastric cancerartificial intelligencemulti-modal dataprecision oncologytreatment response prediction

Identifiers

PMID40904504
PMCPMC12401684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.