Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904652›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Agentic LLM-based robotic systems for real-world applications: a review on their agenticness and ethics.

Emmanuel K Raptis, Athanasios Ch Kapoutsis, Elias B Kosmatopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emmanuel K RaptisInformation Technologies Institute, The Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Athanasios Ch KapoutsisInformation Technologies Institute, The Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Elias B KosmatopoulosInformation Technologies Institute, The Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agentic AI refers to autonomous systems that can perceive their environment, make decisions, and take actions to achieve goals with minimal or no human intervention. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new pathways to imbue robots with such "agentic" behaviors by leveraging the LLMs' vast knowledge and reasoning capabilities for planning and control. This survey provides the first comprehensive exploration of LLM-based robotic systems integration into agentic behaviors that have been validated in real-world applications. We systematically categorized these systems across navigation, manipulation, multi-agent, and general-purpose multi-task robots, reflecting the range of applications explored. We introduce a novel, first-of-its-kind agenticness classification that evaluates existing LLM-driven robotic works based on their degree of autonomy, goal-directed behavior, adaptability, and decision-making. Additionally, central to our contribution is an evaluation framework explicitly addressing ethical, safety, and transparency principles-including bias mitigation, fairness, robustness, safety guardrails, human oversight, explainability, auditability, and regulatory compliance. By jointly mapping the landscape of agentic capabilities and ethical safeguards, we uncover key gaps, tensions, and design trade-offs in current approaches. We believe that this work serves as both a diagnostic and a call to action: as LLM-empowered robots grow more capable, ensuring they remain comprehensible, controllable, and aligned with societal norms is not optional-it is essential.

Indexed as

agentic AIAI transparencyautonomous robotsethical AIhuman-robot interactionintelligent machineslarge language models (LLMs)real-world applications

Identifiers

PMID40904652
PMCPMC12402697

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.