ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025
Safety of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: an age subgroup analysis from a phase IV real-world clinical practice study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04005066 (A Post-Marketing Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety of Elunate®), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Post-Marketing Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety of Elunate® (Fruquintinib Capsules) in Chinese Patients.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety of fruquintinib mono- and combo therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-world subgroup analysis from China.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Early circulating tumor DNA dynamics predict fruquintinib efficacy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer before imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly prevalent among young adults (<50 years) in China, a demographic that has been historically underrepresented in clinical studies. While most patients with CRC are aged ⩾65 years, this age group is also underrepresented in trials, highlighting the need for a better understanding of treatment outcomes in both younger and older populations. A recent phase IV trial evaluating the safety of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) showed a manageable profile. Objectives: This subgroup analysis of the phase IV study primarily aims to evaluate the safety of fruquintinib in different age groups. Design: Prospective real-world study. Methods: The data of patients with CRC from the phase IV fruquintinib trial (NCT04005066) were collected for the young (<50 years) and the late elderly (⩾75 years) patients with CRC who were enrolled between April 24, 2019, and September 27, 2022. The safety outcomes, including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), were recorded. Results: A total of 2798 patients with CRC enrolled in the phase IV study were categorized into two subgroups: 512 were young (age <50), and 239 were late elderly (age ⩾75). The young CRC subgroup received more intense treatment with a median treatment duration of 2.75 months, and the late elderly received a median treatment duration of 2.40 months. Combination therapy duration was longer than that of monotherapy in young (4.10 vs 2.40 months) and late elderly patients (3.90 vs 2.10 months). The incidence of TEAE was comparable across the young (78.71%) and the late elderly groups (77.41%). In the young CRC subgroup, the most common TRAEs were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia ((PPES) 20.31%) and hypertension (14.06%), whereas in the late elderly, they were hypertension (20.50%) and PPES (14.23%). Conclusion: The safety profile of fruquintinib was comparable across age subgroups. Young CRC patients tend to receive more intensive fruquintinib treatment. For the late elderly, who are more susceptible to TRAEs due to underlying health conditions, fruquintinib also offers a safe treatment option. Combination therapy duration was longer than monotherapy in both subgroups, suggesting its promising approach for optimizing treatment outcomes in both age subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.