Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40904832›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Safety of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: an age subgroup analysis from a phase IV real-world clinical practice study.

Yi Wang, Yifu He, Zhiqiang Wang, Haijun Zhong, Zuoxing Niu, Shujun Yang, Tao Zhang, Liangjun Zhu, Yongqian Shu, Jianjun Peng and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04005066 (A Post-Marketing Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety of Elunate®), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04005066 completednot on this map

A Post-Marketing Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety of Elunate® (Fruquintinib Capsules) in Chinese Patients.

TypeobservationalSponsorHutchmedRan2019 to 2022Enrolled3,005ConditionsPatient SafetyArmsElunate®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Yi WangDepartment of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Yifu HeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, China.
Zhiqiang WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Medical Oncology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2658-8781
Haijun ZhongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Zuoxing NiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Shujun YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Tao ZhangCancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Liangjun ZhuJiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Yongqian ShuJiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Jianjun PengCenter of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan SongDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jian LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Ying YuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-9553
Haibo ZhangGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Gengsheng YuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Yunqi HuaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, China.
Jianjun XiaoDepartment of Oncology, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China.
Jianfei FuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Yulong ZhengDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jingyu ZhuHUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China.
Hua XueHUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China.
Xian LuoHUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China.
Michael ShiHUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China.
Weiguo SuHUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China.
Jin LiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai GoBroad Cancer Hospital, China Pharmaceutical University, No. 170, Taipei East Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai 200125, China.
Shukui QinGastrointestinal Cancer Center of Nanjing Tianyinshan Hospital, China Pharmaceutical University, No. 3789, Jiyin Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 211102, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-1521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly prevalent among young adults (<50 years) in China, a demographic that has been historically underrepresented in clinical studies. While most patients with CRC are aged ⩾65 years, this age group is also underrepresented in trials, highlighting the need for a better understanding of treatment outcomes in both younger and older populations. A recent phase IV trial evaluating the safety of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) showed a manageable profile. Objectives: This subgroup analysis of the phase IV study primarily aims to evaluate the safety of fruquintinib in different age groups. Design: Prospective real-world study. Methods: The data of patients with CRC from the phase IV fruquintinib trial (NCT04005066) were collected for the young (<50 years) and the late elderly (⩾75 years) patients with CRC who were enrolled between April 24, 2019, and September 27, 2022. The safety outcomes, including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), were recorded. Results: A total of 2798 patients with CRC enrolled in the phase IV study were categorized into two subgroups: 512 were young (age <50), and 239 were late elderly (age ⩾75). The young CRC subgroup received more intense treatment with a median treatment duration of 2.75 months, and the late elderly received a median treatment duration of 2.40 months. Combination therapy duration was longer than that of monotherapy in young (4.10 vs 2.40 months) and late elderly patients (3.90 vs 2.10 months). The incidence of TEAE was comparable across the young (78.71%) and the late elderly groups (77.41%). In the young CRC subgroup, the most common TRAEs were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia ((PPES) 20.31%) and hypertension (14.06%), whereas in the late elderly, they were hypertension (20.50%) and PPES (14.23%). Conclusion: The safety profile of fruquintinib was comparable across age subgroups. Young CRC patients tend to receive more intensive fruquintinib treatment. For the late elderly, who are more susceptible to TRAEs due to underlying health conditions, fruquintinib also offers a safe treatment option. Combination therapy duration was longer than monotherapy in both subgroups, suggesting its promising approach for optimizing treatment outcomes in both age subgroups.

Indexed as

age-related differencecolorectal cancercombination therapyfruquintinibsafety

Identifiers

PMID40904832
PMCPMC12402659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.